On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Anne van Kesteren <ann...@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Domenic Denicola > <dome...@domenicdenicola.com> wrote: >> So we should make a choice, as to whether we want developers to assume they >> will always get permission (in which case it should reject upon permission >> not being granted), or whether we want developers to ask the API whether >> they were granted permission (in which case it should give back a boolean >> fulfillment value or similar). > > How can they assume permission is always granted? It's up the user. > It's a request from the developer and the user can say no. What's > unclear about the name?
Yeah, you misunderstood the question. It's about whether permission failure should reject the promise or accept it with a boolean. ~TJ
