On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Anne van Kesteren <ann...@annevk.nl> wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Domenic Denicola >> <dome...@domenicdenicola.com> wrote: >>> So we should make a choice, as to whether we want developers to assume they >>> will always get permission (in which case it should reject upon permission >>> not being granted), or whether we want developers to ask the API whether >>> they were granted permission (in which case it should give back a boolean >>> fulfillment value or similar). >> >> How can they assume permission is always granted? It's up the user. >> It's a request from the developer and the user can say no. What's >> unclear about the name? > > Yeah, you misunderstood the question. It's about whether permission > failure should reject the promise or accept it with a boolean.
Domenic did not ask a question. I asked a question since it's unclear to me why a developer could reasonably assume they will always get permission. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
