On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Rick Byers <rby...@chromium.org> wrote: > I think there's a big opportunity to substantially improve scroll > performance on the web in the relatively short term by doing something > incremental. I.e. I'm pretty sure I can get major scroll-blocking libraries > like Google Analytics to opt into the pattern proposed here in a relatively > short timeframe. I'm much less sure I could get them to switch to a > completely new event API in any sort of reasonable timeframe.
Either way they need to branch their code, no? > What do you think about an incremental path? I don't see any fundamental > reason that things need to change drastically. Overloading a boolean argument with a dictionary seems bad. And if we are to have a new API anyway, we might as well pick the better names. > If we can get consensus on the basic approach, then I'd be happy to rework > my proposal in the form of a pull-request and move all issue tracking to > whatwg/dom. There's probably no point in doing that until we have an > agreement on the basic API shape, right? Fair. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/