I like the sandbox concept, as this is more about them being unfinished then something that we wouldn't pull in.
-a On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Andrei Savu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Each new service we add to Whirr makes the product harder to maintain > and develop. At this stage, as we've discussed in the past, it's > really important to focus on evolving the core and improving the > underlying abstractions. Unfortunately at the same time we should keep > in mind that Whirr is more useful only if it supports more services. > > How should we move forward? Refuse to add new services while we > improve the core (doesn't sound like a good idea)? Create something > like contrib/services for partially supported services so that we can > have a clear distinction and decrease the maintenance workload (I > would go for this one)? > > Cheers, > > -- Andrei Savu / andreisavu.ro >
