On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Adrian Cole <[email protected]> wrote: > I like the sandbox concept, as this is more about them being > unfinished then something that we wouldn't pull in.
Yes and we should be able to change the core without having to update all the services to support the new features (e.g rolling restarts, reconfiguration). Should we add something like a supported list of Whirr capabilities for each service?
