Yeah similar to that. I mean we currently even cant employ file-endings.
e.g: you can have /page/param/param
but not /page/param/param.html wich would be even more nice and logic (IMHO)
imagine a mount where you could specify "/" as begin and ".htm" as end. ->
you could have 1 handling-class for all data as well as natural URLs (if you
use IndexedURLParams).
if / is solely you could return the start page, if /.htm is called wicket
knows that it would be the handling-class with empty params...so we also
wouldnt crash with any other wicket functionality.
e.g: globalmount(".htm", new IndexedUrlParamStrategy("/",handler.class));
so you also would centralise URLs to just 1 class in app wich then can
delegate to the resulting pages.
was just a thought from what im in now as i need nice URLs and the problems
i stumbled in regarding static content, root etc.
what do you think about this? - i'm interested in any thoughts about it.
Best Regards,
Korbinian
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Montag, 13. November 2006 10:20
> An: wicket-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Severe Bug in Wicket 2 / WICKET-42
>
> So this way?
>
> / == home page
> /?p=a == homepage with page params.
> /?interface:xxx == an callback to an existing page
> /?bookmarkablePage=xxx == an none mounted bookmarkable page request
> /input == mounted bookmarkable page
>
> and then
>
> /a == this is not mounted like input above.. Then it should
> go to a page that was mounted on /* ??
> So you want to have a fallback to a page?
>
> johan
>
>
>
> On 11/12/06, Korbinian Bachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, that is what i mean -
> >
> > e.g: mount to /*.html -> would mean it goes for /[everything].html
> > wich would introduce even more flexibility...
> >
> > currently, it goes to "/[neededCharacter]" and this catches
> > /[neededCharacter][anythingBehind]
> > e.g: /a ->
> > /a/b is valid
> > /aa/b is valid
> > /a is valid
> >
> > as / is mounted for the homepage and you cant mount a
> wildcard so far,
> > you still need a fixed point you can hook on.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> >
> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 12. November 2006 20:15
> > > An: wicket-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > Betreff: Re: Severe Bug in Wicket 2 / WICKET-42
> > >
> > > what does a page mounted on /* means in your eyes?
> > > /[everything]??
> > >
> > > there is no such a thing like wild card mounting.
> > >
> > > johan
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/12/06, Korbinian Bachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Igor,
> > > >
> > > > yes - but its not mounted to "/*" but to "/" - is it
> > > possible to have
> > > > the homepage mounted on "/*" ? means that this page gets
> > > all path as
> > > > indexedURLparams??
> > > >
> > > > if i mount it to /* he doesnt see it as wildcard but as
> fixed "*"
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > > > Von: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 12. November 2006 18:39
> > > > > An: wicket-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > Betreff: Re: Severe Bug in Wicket 2 / WICKET-42
> > > > >
> > > > > the homepage is always mounted on /
> > > > >
> > > > > -igor
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 11/12/06, Korbinian Bachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Johan,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > i checked all - everything is now behaving as expected.
> > > Great Work!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > One question however is still to me - why cant i mount a
> > > > > page to "/" ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > so i could mount a PageDistribution class there which then
> > > > > handles the
> > > > > > PageParams logic... or would this get in conflict with
> > > the rest
> > > > > > of wicket ?
> > > > > > if so, would it be possible to have a page responsible for
> > > > > every path
> > > > > > behind / but for /wicket/ where the internal could
> be handled ??
> > > > > >
> > > > > > i know this aproach is a bit away from what wicket was
> > > made for...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rgards
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > > > > > Von: Korbinian Bachl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 12. November 2006 10:32
> > > > > > > An: wicket-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > > Betreff: AW: Severe Bug in Wicket 2 / WICKET-42
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Really fast :)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > i check it out soon and report,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > > > > > > Von: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > Gesendet: Samstag, 11. November 2006 23:17
> > > > > > > > An: wicket-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > > > Betreff: Re: Severe Bug in Wicket 2 / WICKET-42
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > should be fixed now.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 11/11/06, Korbinian Bachl
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > well, it works if it is:
> > > > > > > > > a, the first access of the WebApp with no provious
> > > > > > > ReDeploy b, the
> > > > > > > > > root is accessed then
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > if i redeploy just once, i cant access the
> root anymore
> > > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > however the
> > > > > > > > > direct path always works...
> > > > > > > > > if i redeploy it and access the path before, it chains
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > another danger thing is that following works:
> > > > > > > > > assume you have IndexedPageParams and index.class
> > > > > > > > > mounted
> > > > > > > to /Index:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > if you then access it via /Index/foo/bar/Index/foo2
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > and print out pageparams.toString you only
> get 0=foo2 ,
> > > > > > > meaning he
> > > > > > > > > access it at last point, and not at first!
> > > > > > > > > This violates JEE security !!!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > i also noticed that if you use a servlet and
> > > > > > > > BookMarkablePageLinks the
> > > > > > > > > URLs look like these
> > > 127.0.0.1/<servlet>?param=value - and
> > > > > > > > mounting
> > > > > > > > > using a servlet was not possible at all
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Best Regards
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Korbinian
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > > > > > > > > Von: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Samstag, 11. November 2006 17:30
> > > > > > > > > > An: wicket-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > Betreff: Re: Severe Bug in Wicket 2 / WICKET-42
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > does it always just work if always your
> first access
> > > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > the root of
> > > > > > > > > > your webapp?
> > > > > > > > > > So if you redeploy or restart then your
> first request
> > > > > > > > should be the
> > > > > > > > > > root of your webapp.
> > > > > > > > > > Then afterwards should everything just work.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > This is a bug yes i have to rollback code for
> > > this because
> > > > > > > > > > getServletPath() can't be depended on in a filter
> > > > > > > configuration.
> > > > > > > > > > Which we do now.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > johan
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 11/11/06, Korbinian Bachl
> > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I issued a severe BUG
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-42
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Korbinian
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
