Other than what I've mentioned it looks fine (what did you do about the notice/license in jar files?
Frank On 2/7/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did everybody take a close look at the release candidate? Is it good for general availability? Martijn On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now available. > > Martijn > > On 2/4/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Another thing: Where is wicket-examples? > > > > Frank > > > > > > On 2/4/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > [ ] Don't release, because... > > > > [x] Share these files with the greater public > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well... :o) > > > The artifacts looks "ok" since we don't release them as ASF endorsed. They > > > of cause lack the stuff we have been working on for 1.3. > > > > > > One thing though. It's good that you have put the DISCLAIMER in the NOTICE > > > files, but perhaps we should also have it in the jar files (the NOTICE I > > > mean). But then again it's an unofficial release... WDYT? > > > > > > Frank > > > > > > > > > > -- > Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket > Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! > http://wicketframework.org > -- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
