As I mentioned in another thread, my preference would be 'checkpoint', maybe with a date, but as long as we don't raise any expectations about it, then I'm not against making it semi-public if/when we get it cleared.
/Gwyn On 11/03/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/11/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > i am afraid of people starting to use it. put a lot of time into it, > then > > upgrade to beta2 and have to redo a bunch of crap. if this happened to > me id > > be pissed, i dont like to have the poverbial rug pulled from under me > when > > im using a beta. > > So we don't call it beta but alpha or integration build with a date or > just a date, we don't put it on sourceforge but just on maven. As a user, I would prefer alpha or integration build than beta, it is much closer to the purpose of this release, and make it more obvious. - Xavier > if we are going to break it then lets at least do it before we have any > sort > > of a public release. until then people who dont mind living on the > bleeding > > edge can build from source - which those kinds of people do anyways. > > It is not for the people who are on 1.2, but who are on 1.3. I expect > most to follow asap - which is THE reason why I would like it in 1.3 > rather than 1.4 but this intermediate fixture would give people a > change to take a breath. > > Eelco >
