Bart Molenkamp a écrit :
Vincent Demay wrote:
If I well understand it is a class named wicketstuff giving access to
each function of each package as a subclass of wicketstuff?
I like that, so +1
I don't understand exactly what you mean. I now have classes coded in
JavaScript (similair like most - if not all - classes are coded in
dojo) and I configured dojo to know where to find classes in the
wicketstuff namespace. There isn't anything like a wicketstuff class.
I need to do some cleanup, then I'll checkin. You'll see what I mean,
and it can be easily reverted if we deceide that we don't like it, OK?
fine, no pb
Bart.