I'd vote for 2.0, but what about waiting for that, after wicket leaves apache incubator? Until, 1.4 is fine I think. :)
Cheers PS: Wicket in Brazil... :) http://blog.brunoborges.com.br/search/label/Wicket -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (48) 8404-1300 (11) 3055-2060 On 4/29/07, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
we listed the microsoft naming convention (Wicket 2007) but skipped right over sun's naming conventions! what about "Apache Wicket SE 6u1" or "Apache Wicket W2SE 6.0 WDK" [X] Apache Wicket 2.0 the requirement of JDK 1.5 is actually a major shift for users even if it doesn't break APIs. i also think the constructor change branch will quickly be forgotten. Martijn Dashorst wrote: > > There is a vote already in place for switching the development > branches around. Now it is time to name the release after 1.3 (and not > 1.3.1 :). > > Apache Wicket 1.3 will be followed by: > [ ] Apache Wicket 1.4 > [ ] Apache Wicket 1.5 (after the JDK) > [ ] Apache Wicket 5 (similar, but more accurate) > [ ] Apache Wicket 2.0 (i.e. becomes our old 2.0 minus the c'tor change) > [ ] Apache Wicket 2007 > [ ] Apache Wicket r59332 (just use the damned revision number) > > Other proposals are permitted. > > Martijn > > -- > Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com > Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket > Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now! > http://wicketframework.org > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-vote--Name-the-release-after-1.3-tf3603749.html#a10245158 Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
