+1 Eelco
On 5/5/07, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
so i propose a vote to add this. i'm +1. Eelco Hillenius wrote: > > Yeah. I actually think I proposed something like this, or at least > +1-ed one at more than a year ago. You'll have to dig in the archives > to find out why other people didn't agree back then, but I still think > it's much easier for users to discover something just because it has > an obvious name, and not to worry about that one extra class. > > Eelco > > > On 5/4/07, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> In my work project, I've added and frequently use an EmptyPanel which is >> simply a panel with empty markup. Although you can do the same thing >> with >> WebMarkupContainer or implement this yourself, it does seem like a nice >> conceptual addition, particularly for newbies who might not think "hmm... >> i >> want an empty panel instead of this fancy panel if the user isn't logged >> in... oh WebMarkupContainer looks about right..." ;-) Anyway, I thought >> I'd >> mention it in case others feel this would be a nice addition to core. >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/EmptyPanel--tf3692546.html#a10324363 >> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/EmptyPanel--tf3692546.html#a10333463 Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
