Ryan, lets finish this thread and move on to gTalk and *talk* about this. I'm adding you right now.
No, I dont have an account yet, and yes you can start the project in wicket-stuff and after that, I'll ask you for permission. What'd you think? []' s -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (48) 8404-1300 (11) 3055-2060 On 5/8/07, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey Bruno, I'd love to contribute. My experience with annotations and hibernate validators is very limited, but I'd love to dig in. do you have any place to start for source code? I'd like to start a small project in wicket-stuff to try this out. do you have account setup for wicket-stuff access? On 5/8/07, Bruno Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ryan, want to work together on this? > > Regards, > -- > Bruno Borges > Summa Technologies Inc. > www.summa-tech.com > (48) 8404-1300 > (11) 3055-2060 > > On 5/8/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I think someone (you?) just has to take up the initiative. I think the > > core team is too tight up atm. > > > > Eelco > > > > > > On 5/8/07, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I haven't heard anything on this thread for a while, and it seemed > > > really exciting. Has there been any progress on creating a wicket > > > validator that uses hibernate annotations? anything available in > > > wicket-stuff to take a look at? > > > > > > On 4/25/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 4/25/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > naah, we share this list with wicket-stuff. makes it easier. > > > > Ok, sorry, next time I'll just put a +1 to give my opinion, it will > > > > save a couple of emails :-) > > > > > > > > Xavier > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/25/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/25/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > why would our opinion matter? you are free to start a > > wicket-stuff > > > > > > project > > > > > > > to integrate whatever you want :) > > > > > > Agreed, but since Bruno posted on the dev mailing list, I thought > > he > > > > > > was more specifically asking opinion from the wicket team. > > > > > > > > > > > > Xavier > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/25/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/25/07, Bruno Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Sorry.. worst than Draft Review: JSR 303 is in Draft Ballot > > yet!! So > > > > > > > > it'll > > > > > > > > > take some time until a final specification for this under > > JPA. :( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let's continue with HV ? :D > > > > > > > > It seems reasonable to me, but the opinion from Wicket team > > would be > > > > > > > > much more valuable than mine. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Xavier > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > []'s > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Bruno Borges > > > > > > > > > Summa Technologies Inc. > > > > > > > > > www.summa-tech.com > > > > > > > > > (48) 8404-1300 > > > > > > > > > (11) 3055-2060 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/25/07, Bruno Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hibernate Validation is related to JSR 303< > > > > > > > > http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=303>, > > > > > > > > > > which is in draft review yet... :( > > > > > > > > > > And most probably HV will be used as RI with changes to > > JPA for > > > > > > sure. > > > > > > > > > > But maybe it can start as a contrib project, what'd you > > think? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > []'s > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > Bruno Borges > > > > > > > > > > Summa Technologies Inc. > > > > > > > > > > www.summa-tech.com > > > > > > > > > > (48) 8404-1300 > > > > > > > > > > (11) 3055-2060 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/25/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I haven't had time to check HV in depth for the moment > > but I've > > > > > > > > heard > > > > > > > > > > > good things about it, and was about to ask the same > > question as > > > > > > > > Bruno, > > > > > > > > > > > because I would be interested too in such a validator. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martijn, doesn't your proposition to rely on JPA spec > > instead of > > > > > > HV > > > > > > > > > > > imply to rewrite sg similar to what has been done in HV? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Xavier > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/25/07, Martijn Dashorst < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I would most like want this to be built against the > > JPA spec > > > > > > > > instead > > > > > > > > > > > > of directly implementing Hibernate's validators. Then > > we can > > > > > > use > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > for toplink, hibernate, openjpa, etc. And it is Apache > > license > > > > > > > > > > > > friendly too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martijn > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/25/07, Bruno Borges < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I was thinking of a Validator like the Ajax one. See > > this > > > > > > > > example: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TextField email = new TextField("email"); > > > > > > > > > > > > > email.add(new JPAValidator()); // or new > > JPAValidator( > > > > > > Pojo.class > > > > > > > > ); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And the class scans the Model for annotated > > properties and > > > > > > adds > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > related > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wicket validators automatically. If the Model is a > > POJO not > > > > > > > > > > > annotated with > > > > > > > > > > > > > @Entity, its possible to use JPAValidator(Class > > clazz);. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @EmailValidation // a custom HV email's annotation > > pattern > > > > > > > > > > > > > public String getEmail() { return email; } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What you guys think about this? (I like to see the > > code I'd > > > > > > like > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > use and > > > > > > > > > > > > > implement it around the examples... :D ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > []'s > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bruno Borges > > > > > > > > > > > > > Summa Technologies Inc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > www.summa-tech.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > (48) 8404-1300 > > > > > > > > > > > > > (11) 3055-2060 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/24/07, Eelco Hillenius < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've been thinking about it, haven't got around > > doing it. > > > > > > > > Should > > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pretty easy to do, especially with our shiny new > > > > > > validators. > > > > > > > > Maybe > > > > > > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > > > > > > > can make this a shared effort? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eelco > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/24/07, Bruno Borges < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Has anybody made an integration between Wicket > > and > > > > > > Hibernate > > > > > > > > > > > Validator? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HV > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is probably going to be the reference > > implementation for > > > > > > JSR > > > > > > > > 303 > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JBoss > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Seams use it integrated with JSF. Looks cool... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://hibernate.org/412.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=303 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bruno Borges > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Summa Technologies Inc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > www.summa-tech.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (48) 8404-1300 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (11) 3055-2060 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com > > > > > > > > > > > > Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: > > ##wicket > > > > > > > > > > > > Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download > > Wicket > > > > > > now! > > > > > > > > > > > > http://wicketframework.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > Learn Ivy at ApacheCon: http://www.eu.apachecon.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > Manage your dependencies with Ivy! > > > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Learn Ivy at ApacheCon: http://www.eu.apachecon.com/ > > > > > > > > Manage your dependencies with Ivy! > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Learn Ivy at ApacheCon: http://www.eu.apachecon.com/ > > > > > > Manage your dependencies with Ivy! > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Learn Ivy at ApacheCon: http://www.eu.apachecon.com/ > > > > Manage your dependencies with Ivy! > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/ > > > > > > > > > >
