Ryan, want to work together on this?

Regards,
--
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060

On 5/8/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I think someone (you?) just has to take up the initiative. I think the
core team is too tight up atm.

Eelco


On 5/8/07, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't heard anything on this thread for a while, and it seemed
> really exciting.  Has there been any progress on creating a wicket
> validator that uses hibernate annotations?  anything available in
> wicket-stuff to take a look at?
>
> On 4/25/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 4/25/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > naah, we share this list with wicket-stuff. makes it easier.
> > Ok, sorry, next time I'll just put a +1 to give my opinion, it will
> > save a couple of emails :-)
> >
> > Xavier
> >
> > >
> > > -igor
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/25/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 4/25/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > why would our opinion matter? you are free to start a
wicket-stuff
> > > > project
> > > > > to integrate whatever you want :)
> > > > Agreed, but since Bruno posted on the dev mailing list, I thought
he
> > > > was more specifically asking opinion from the wicket team.
> > > >
> > > > Xavier
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -igor
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 4/25/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 4/25/07, Bruno Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > Sorry.. worst than Draft Review: JSR 303 is in Draft Ballot
yet!! So
> > > > > > it'll
> > > > > > > take some time until a final specification for this under
JPA. :(
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Let's continue with HV ? :D
> > > > > > It seems reasonable to me, but the opinion from Wicket team
would be
> > > > > > much more valuable than mine.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Xavier
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > []'s
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Bruno Borges
> > > > > > > Summa Technologies Inc.
> > > > > > > www.summa-tech.com
> > > > > > > (48) 8404-1300
> > > > > > > (11) 3055-2060
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 4/25/07, Bruno Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hibernate Validation is related to JSR 303<
> > > > > > http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=303>,
> > > > > > > > which is in draft review yet... :(
> > > > > > > > And most probably HV will be used as RI with changes to
JPA for
> > > > sure.
> > > > > > > > But maybe it can start as a contrib project, what'd you
think?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > []'s
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Bruno Borges
> > > > > > > > Summa Technologies Inc.
> > > > > > > > www.summa-tech.com
> > > > > > > > (48) 8404-1300
> > > > > > > > (11) 3055-2060
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 4/25/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I haven't had time to check HV in depth for the moment
but I've
> > > > > > heard
> > > > > > > > > good things about it, and was about to ask the same
question as
> > > > > > Bruno,
> > > > > > > > > because I would be interested too in such a validator.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Martijn, doesn't your proposition to rely on JPA spec
instead of
> > > > HV
> > > > > > > > > imply to rewrite sg similar to what has been done in HV?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Xavier
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 4/25/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > I would most like want this to be built against the
JPA spec
> > > > > > instead
> > > > > > > > > > of directly implementing Hibernate's validators. Then
we can
> > > > use
> > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > for toplink, hibernate, openjpa, etc. And it is Apache
license
> > > > > > > > > > friendly too.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Martijn
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 4/25/07, Bruno Borges < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > I was thinking of a Validator like the Ajax one. See
this
> > > > > > example:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > TextField email = new TextField("email");
> > > > > > > > > > > email.add(new JPAValidator()); // or new
JPAValidator(
> > > > Pojo.class
> > > > > > );
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > And the class scans the Model for annotated
properties and
> > > > adds
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > related
> > > > > > > > > > > Wicket validators automatically. If the Model is a
POJO not
> > > > > > > > > annotated with
> > > > > > > > > > > @Entity,  its possible to use JPAValidator(Class
clazz);.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > @EmailValidation // a custom HV email's annotation
pattern
> > > > > > > > > > > public String getEmail() { return email; }
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > What you guys think about this? (I like to see the
code I'd
> > > > like
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > use and
> > > > > > > > > > > implement it around the examples... :D )
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > []'s
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > Bruno Borges
> > > > > > > > > > > Summa Technologies Inc.
> > > > > > > > > > > www.summa-tech.com
> > > > > > > > > > > (48) 8404-1300
> > > > > > > > > > > (11) 3055-2060
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 4/24/07, Eelco Hillenius <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I've been thinking about it, haven't got around
doing it.
> > > > > > Should
> > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > pretty easy to do, especially with our shiny new
> > > > validators.
> > > > > > Maybe
> > > > > > > > > we
> > > > > > > > > > > > can make this a shared effort?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Eelco
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/24/07, Bruno Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Has anybody made an integration between Wicket
and
> > > > Hibernate
> > > > > > > > > Validator?
> > > > > > > > > > > > HV
> > > > > > > > > > > > > is probably going to be the reference
implementation for
> > > > JSR
> > > > > > 303
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > JBoss
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Seams use it integrated with JSF. Looks cool...
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://hibernate.org/412.html
> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=303
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Bruno Borges
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Summa Technologies Inc.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > www.summa-tech.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (48) 8404-1300
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (11) 3055-2060
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
> > > > > > > > > > Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net:
##wicket
> > > > > > > > > > Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download
Wicket
> > > > now!
> > > > > > > > > > http://wicketframework.org
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Learn Ivy at ApacheCon: http://www.eu.apachecon.com/
> > > > > > > > > Manage your dependencies with Ivy!
> > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Learn Ivy at ApacheCon: http://www.eu.apachecon.com/
> > > > > > Manage your dependencies with Ivy!
> > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Learn Ivy at ApacheCon: http://www.eu.apachecon.com/
> > > > Manage your dependencies with Ivy!
> > > > http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Learn Ivy at ApacheCon: http://www.eu.apachecon.com/
> > Manage your dependencies with Ivy!
> > http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/
> >
>

Reply via email to