On 5/14/07, Ryan Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
fwiw, I think your initial opinion was correct (i.e. validator HAS-A behavior). Besides the reasons you and others already mentioned, couldn't a validator contribute multiple behaviors?
Yep. They can do that now. I've let it rest a bit and still like the current solution best, at least considering the code base we have now. Unless someone has big objections, I think we're good and can concentrate on getting to a release, getting bugs out, etc. Eelco
