Actually there is also a protected internalDestroy (still not final
though) which calls destroy so why not put callDestroyers there ?
Maurice
On 6/20/07, Sean Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
On 6/20/07, Al Maw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From the Application#destroy() javadoc:
>
> /**
> * Called when wicket servlet is destroyed.
> * Overrides do not have to call super.
> */
> protected void destroy()
> {
> callDestroyers();
> }
>
> That's not ideal - surely we want to be certain the destroyers are called?
>
> I think we should make this method final, and provide an onDestroy()
> hook that is called within it.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Regards,
>
> Al
>
> --
> Alastair Maw
> Wicket-biased blog at http://herebebeasties.com
>
