do i need a vote to make this change at this point?
Eelco Hillenius wrote: > >> It might be good to be more defensive here then (as I think the trace I >> got >> had lost the info in both places): We could turn >> Strings.toString(Throwable) >> back into a simple version that always gives you the entire stack trace >> (I >> would really prefer that since this is supposed to be a generic utility). >> Then take the fancy version that's in the util package now and make a >> private implementation detail of the exception page(s). That way nobody >> can >> accidentally make the mistake of removing exception information from a >> log >> or the console. > > I agree. > > Eelco > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/abbreviated-stack-traces-tf3837742.html#a11219888 Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
