please send in a patch so that we can have the right names before the final
of 1.3

On 7/1/07, Gerolf Seitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

i found some naming inconsistencies:
JavaScriptReference vs. JavascriptResourceReference
there are some other Java(S/s)cript classes...

gerolf

On 6/30/07, jweekend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> FYI, I successfully downloaded the 1.3.0 beta2 release from
> http://www.apache.org/dist/wicket/1.3.0-beta2/ .
> We're putting a course together, based on 1.3 so hopefully the APIs are
> fairly stable now. Having said that, if there is stuff that no longer
> makes
> any sense (unhelpful naming, bad signatures ...), IMO, this is probably
> the
> last chance to change it without causing a riot, so I'd say it's better
> now
> than never.
> Cemal
>
>
>
> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> >
> > The build now includes guice and ioc, and the release notes (list of
> > fixed JIRA issues)
> >
> > [ ] I have checked the distribution and +1 its release
> > [ ] I haven't checked the distribution and +0 its release
> > [ ] I have checked the distribution and -1 its release because...
> >
> > I will try to upload this to the mirroring site once we have enough
> > +1's (3 minimal), if we have enough karma to do so. Otherwise, we'll
> > just have to do without 2000+ downloads.
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > --
> > Wicket joins the Apache Software Foundation as Apache Wicket
> > Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
> > Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download Wicket now!
> > http://wicketframework.org
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
>
http://www.nabble.com/-vote--rebuild-of-wicket-1.3.0-beta-2-tf3996683.html#a11369135
> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Reply via email to