Thats allright I removed the line that added the org/wicketstuff/scriptaculous/autocomplete/AbstractAutocompleteBehavior.js because this file no longuer exist.
And worked. But I will contribute latter with a new autocomplete. Nice the opacity incrementation of scriptaculous thaugh ;-). Thanks guys, latter on I'll contact you or Igor so you may review the code, and to ask some directions on how to contribute the work. I'll be extending Igor's version I think. Thanks, f(t) PS: probably tomorrow. On 7/17/07, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hmmm...seems like a bug to me. i'll look into it. On 7/17/07, Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The wicket-scriptaculous sample throws the following exception due to a > AbstractAutocompleteBehavior.js that is not present in the > wicket-scriptaculous. > > I have svn the last version known. I don't know I'll try with the user > list. > > WicketMessage: Exception in rendering component: [MarkupContainer > [Component > id = -header, page = > test.wicket.autocomplete.pages.ScriptaculousAutocomplete, path = 0:- > header.HtmlHeaderContainer, isVisible = true, isVersioned = true]] > > Root cause: > > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: resource > AbstractAutocompleteBehavior.jsnot found for scope class > org.wicketstuff.scriptaculous.autocomplete.AbstractAutocompleteBehavior (path > = > > org/wicketstuff/scriptaculous/autocomplete/AbstractAutocompleteBehavior.js) > at org.apache.wicket.util.template.PackagedTextTemplate.<init>( > PackagedTextTemplate.java:167) > at org.apache.wicket.util.template.PackagedTextTemplate.<init>( > PackagedTextTemplate.java:135) > at org.apache.wicket.util.template.PackagedTextTemplate.<init>( > PackagedTextTemplate.java:118) > > > > On 7/16/07, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'd be interested to know if you had any issues using the > > wicket-scriptaculous autocomplete component? > > > > On 7/16/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On 7/16/07, Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I think a new form of autocomplete is needed. One that could better > > > > abstract > > > > scenarios in which user don't want to use the UL LI elements. > > > > > > > > I plan in developing one, if the boss approves, and wanted to know > if > > I > > > > can > > > > send it to some of you so you 'll review it and see if I can > > contribute > > > > some > > > > to the cause... ;-) > > > > > > > > > create a jira and attach a patch > > > preferably what you do is hack up the existing one instead of starting > > > from > > > scratch. > > > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > > f(t) > > > > > > > > > >
