Yes, I was thinking in the same direction. MarkupParser does only accept the wicket namespace. I''ll make the change, but I won't have write access to cvs for next 3 days. In case it is urgent, I can sent the fix to you, Eelco.
Juergen On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 23:35:31 +0100, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I was playing with XUL a bit and created a small example in wicket-examples. > > Unfortunately, I found out that namespaces are not parsed properly. > > E.g.: <html:input type="text" id="wicket-messageInput"/> > > The parser (using WordParser) will just take 'html' as the tagName, > instead of html:input or input. > > If it's not too difficult, I'd vote for having a seperate namespace > property of ComponentTag. > > I checked the example in for anyone that wants to fix this bug and wants > to a test ready for it. > > Eelco > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues > Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. > It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-develop mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop > ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
