Sounds good to me.
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 10:45:29 -0800, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > maybe we should have a single setStrip(int flags) method and allow > various things to be stripped via flags. > > STRIP_COMMENTS - removes html comments > STRIP_REDUNDANT_WHITESPACE - compresses whitespace > STRIP_WICKET_TAGS - removes <wicket:*> tags > STRIP_WICKET_IDS - removes wicket ids entirely > STRIP_WICKET_ID_PREFIXES - removes just the wicket id prefix > > make sense? > > Juergen Donnerstag wrote: > > >sounds much better. Does it make sense to have two separate flags to > >enable/disable stripping. One for <wicket:....> and one for "empty" > ><span id="wicket-...">? > > > >Juergen > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- > >The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues > >Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. > >It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt > >_______________________________________________ > >Wicket-develop mailing list > >[email protected] > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues > Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. > It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-develop mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop > ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
