These are no important points, just ideas:
What about OpenLaszlo (http://www.openlaszlo.org) integration/support?
And what do you guys think about XUL support?
- Johannes.
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
All,
As we just have release 1.1 I'd like to start a feature discussion on
Wicket 1.2, and on what timeframe we wish to ship it.
What are our major concerns for Wicket 1.2?
I just list a few things I think could be on the feature list:
- reference documentation
- database integration
- session size/state management
- single component markup generation
- portal support
- testing
I also think we should aim for some release date. I would like us to
focus on smaller releases, and maybe strive for 4 releases per year.
Currently we are at 2.1 releases per year. My proposal is to do
time-boxed, feature driven development, aiming for high quality and
less focus on more features per release. Having a schedule of 4
releases, means releasing each 3 months. Currently a typical release
candidate is out there for about 3 weeks, and we usually have 2
release candidates. This means the last 6 weeks are RC time. This is
half of a 3 month release, and seems too much IMO.
Your thoughts please?
Martijn
--
Living a wicket life...
Martijn Dashorst - http://www.jroller.com/page/dashorst
Wicket 1.1 is out: http://wicket.sourceforge.net/wicket-1.1
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
