Even if we keep the old autolink approach, how would you refer
to it now? We no longer support IDs with brackets in them.Gili On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 21:33:13 +0100, Eelco Hillenius wrote: >I made up my mind about the autolink replacement proposal (which is that >instead of using <a id="wicket-[autolink], all anchors would be scanned >and tested for matches with Wicket pages). > >I am -1 on this. I see one theoretic advantage (not having to think >about adding the [autolink] id) and many disadvantages (less clarity, >performance impact, error prone... see discussion). > >Regards, > >Eelco > > >------------------------------------------------------- >The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues >Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. >It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt >_______________________________________________ >Wicket-user mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user > ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
