On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 12:35:54 -0800, Jonathan Locke wrote:
>i understand the "problem". i just don't think it's worth fixing. in
>fact, "fixing" it is kindof against wicket philosophy and tends to take
>a view of "wicket is the world", which it will never be. the wicket
>philosophy is to let things do what they do well and not try to change
>them; to delegate responsibility. what we need to do here is allow the
>container to serve static pages the way it normally does... because
>that's what it's good at.
Fine, so what is your proposed behavior (please summarize
because I've lost track on where we stand)?
Thanks,
Gili
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
