Yes, you are right, I actually have to repeat the name. Thanks!

2005/10/11, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
wicket:id doesn't have to be unique over a page and css/_javascript_ id has to be so just stripping it can result in an illegal page.



On 10/11/05, Eduardo Rocha <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
I was wondering if I didn't need to repeat the same name in wicket:id and id.

2005/10/11, Martijn Dashorst < [EMAIL PROTECTED] >:
Why would you want to do this?

The nature of the wicket:id xml tag is such that it is not a great candidate for a HTML id. A html id is very handy for selecting in CSS, and you don't want version numbering in there.

Martijn



On 10/11/05, Eduardo Rocha <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
Is there an easy way of replacing 'wicket:id' with 'id' instead of strip all the 'wicket:id'?




Reply via email to