Sounds like a good one for core. Eelco
On 10/17/05, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > send it in as a patch/rfe on sourceforge. > Maybe we could add this to core or extentions in 1.2 > > johan > > > > On 10/17/05, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > yeah...forgot that one ... in my usecase singlechoices were directly under > the group :) > > -Igor > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Ingram Chen > > Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 12:52 AM > > > > To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net > > Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Standalong Radio component ? > > > > > > > > Ok, I try nested with list but found a problem while SingleRadioChoice try > to find parent > > > > //original code: > > private RadioChoiceGroup findGroup() { > > MarkupContainer parent = getParent(); > > while (parent != null) { > > if (parent instanceof RadioChoiceGroup) { > > return (RadioChoiceGroup) parent; > > } > > } > > //..... omit > > } > > > > this make findGroup() run infinitely. > > > > I try to fix this by: > > > > private RadioChoiceGroup findGroup() { > > MarkupContainer parent = getParent(); > > while (parent != null) { > > if (parent instanceof RadioChoiceGroup) { > > return (RadioChoiceGroup) parent; > > } else { > > parent = parent.getParent(); > > } > > } > > // omit.... > > } > > > > and now work ! > > > > > > > > On 10/17/05, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > the singleradiochoice is not tied *directly* to the group. Its > requirement is that the group component be somewhere above in the hierrachy. > so per your example: > > > > > > RadioChoiceGroup group=new RadioChoiceGroup(....); > > > group.add(list); > > > ... > > > > > > -Igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Ingram Chen > > > Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 12:18 AM > > > To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net > > > Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Standalong Radio component ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank quick response ! This almost fit my requirement. but > SingleRadioChoice seems tight to RadioChoiceGroup. My form is dynamic > constructed from database, so I need to use ListView to build, like: > > > > > > ListView list = new ListView("checks", listOfData) { > > > @Override > > > protected void populateItem(ListItem item) { > > > item.add(new SingleRadioChoice("choice", new > PropertyModel(myModel,"selected")); > > > > > > Data data = (Data) item.getModelObject() ; > > > item.add(new TextField("input", new PropertyModel(data, > "input")); > > > } > > > }; > > > > > > Any Idea ? > > > > > > > > > On 10/17/05, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Yes, wicket lacks one of these. Just threw one together, let me know > if it works for you or if you find any bugs. Something like this is too > small for a wicket-stuff project, any ideas what i should do with it? > > > > > > > > Basically it works like this. > > > > > > > > Person p=new Person(); /// this is the model > > > > > > > > RadioChoiceGroup group=new RadioChoiceGroup("group", new > PropertyModel(p, "name")); > > > > > > > > g.add(new SingleRadioChoice("c1", new Model("bob")); > > > > > > > > g.add(new SingleRadioChoice("c2", new Model("dean")); > > > > > > > > ---- > > > > > > > > <span wicket:id="group"> > > > > > > > > <input type="radio" wicket:id="c1">choose bob</input><br/> > > > > > > > > <input type="radio" wicket:id="c1">choose dean</input><br/> > > > > > > > > </span> > > > > > > > > the single choice components connect to the group by searching up the > component hierarchy for the first group. > > > > > > > > -Igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Ingram Chen > > > > Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2005 8:58 PM > > > > To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net > > > > Subject: [Wicket-user] Standalong Radio component ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I know there is a RadioChoice component and it works great.... , but > IChoiceRenderer > > > > seems not enough when I need to do like: > > > > > > > > <p>Choose your anwer:</p> > > > > <input type="radio" >Answer 1 </input><br/> > > > > <input type="radio" >Answer 2 </input><br/> > > > > <input type="radio" >Other: <input type="text" name="others" /> > </input><br/> > > > > > > > > Is there a standalone radio componet like CheckBox ? > > > > Or another way to solve above problem ? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > -- > > > > Ingram Chen > > > > Java [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Institue of BioMedical Sciences Academia Sinica Taiwan > > > > blog: > http://www.javaworld.com.tw/roller/page/ingramchen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Ingram Chen > > > Java [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Institue of BioMedical Sciences Academia Sinica Taiwan > > > blog: > http://www.javaworld.com.tw/roller/page/ingramchen > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Ingram Chen > > Java [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Institue of BioMedical Sciences Academia Sinica Taiwan > > blog: http://www.javaworld.com.tw/roller/page/ingramchen > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
