On 1/30/06, pepone pepone <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
nobody see this as a problem??
On 1/24/06, pepone pepone < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all
>
> I using wicket and think that there is samething wrong in this
> framework when you have 10 diferents classes in
> wicket.markup.html.link and there isńt way to create a bookmarkable
> link to a resource that need params using any of them.
>
> and with my knowledge of wicket there isn't a simple way of do it.
>
> Other thing that i cosider is wrong in this framework is the way in
> you handle "nice url" because mount a Page can break it, if the page
> use params because params aren't in request->getParam()
>
> The user must changue the way in they retrive pageParams. this is not
> clean in WebFramework that try to simplificate the developers work.
> and it must be complety transparent for end users
>
>
> I view same inecesary complexity in this details. Or the way in you
> implement AbstractRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy and hard code the
> charcter "/" four times in the same file and you must implement other
> class only for changue this seperator is excesive work for and end
> user point of view.
>
> I write this lines as a constructive critique of what i see wrong in
> wicket i don't try to disturb you. And in general Wicket is a good
> work and i experct it'll be better in a near future
>
> --
> play tetris http://pepone.on-rez.com/tetris
>
--
play tetris http://pepone.on-rez.com/tetris
