The doctype is xhtml transitional. But there's an additional comment
(<!-- -->) before doctype to trick IE and make it work in quirks mode.
(Because in standard compliance mode IE uses the W3C box model, which
sucks).
This should work with strict too. Also <?xml header would do this, but
wicket is kind of reluctant to print it, so i just put comment there).
So far, this setup works (tested) for Firefox, Opera, Konqueror, IE5.0+.
Only thing i'm not sure with is IE7. If it won't be fooled by comment
before doctype and won't allow to set box-sizing in standard compliance
mode there will be a problem. I hope MS engineers are sane enough to
implement box-sizing css property, which is currently supported by any
decend browser (except for IE of course).
-Matej
Johan Compagner wrote:
So you are saying that it is possible to support many browser to get
border-box?
hmm that would solve so many problems we have...
So you let IE stay in quircks mode and have for firefox that
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
and for other browsers (maybe IE7) the CSS3? standard: box-sizing:
border-box;
What is your doctype?
johan
On 5/18/06, *Matej Knopp* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> allow myself to quote...myself
>
> || imho, html is the best layout manager out there for browser
apps. add
> css to the mix and you have a great skin manager as well.
>
> i never said css was great for layout manager :) and yes the box
model
> is broken.
The box model really is broken. Therefore I always stick with IE box
model
* {
box-sizing: border-box;
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
}
The only thing to take care of is not to allow IE6 to work in
standard-compliance mode. So far, I had no problems with this setup. I'm
doing quite complicated layouts using just css (no tables) and
everything works fine. I just hope that IE7 won't screw everything up.
-Matej
>
> -Igor
>
>
> On 5/17/06, *Johan Compagner* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
>
> ha! and css is easier then layout manager in java...
> hmm that is not how i see it.
> CSS is just plain horrible stupid box thing..
>
> And what is a layout manager in css? There isn't one
everything is
> sort of absoluut positioned and then you can do in swing also
> (not recommended ofcourse)
>
> johan
>
>
> On 5/17/06, *Igor Vaynberg* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote:
>
> imho, html is the best layout manager out there for browser
> apps. add css to the mix and you have a great skin
manager as well.
>
> the one thing you always hear swing developers bitching
about is
> how they have to fight the layout managers to get the results
> they want. gridbaglayout is poweful but its a huge pain
to work
> with.
>
> matisse+grouplayout are the holy grail for swing devels, its
> nice and easy to create layouts. but it still requires a
gui to
> do this, while i can do html easily by hand. also browser
screen
> space doesnt translate easily to the desktop space. in
desktop
> space you are pixel aware, you are also pixel aware of your
> fonts and the south east corner of the window. in html
you have
> none of these things.
>
> look at wingS framework examples, they use layout
managers. look
> how rectangular their examples look.
>
> -Igor
>
>
>
>
> On 5/17/06, *Frank Silbermann *
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
>
> I, personally, don't care for HTML, and perhaps I
might enjoy
> programming in Echo2 better.
>
> But suppose an employer maintained an HTML fragment with
> links to their
> entire portfolio of web applications, and wanted this
> fragment to appear
> on every page of each web application. Since someone
else is
> maintaining that scrap and keeping it up-to-date, I would
> not want to
> translate it into Echo 2 and maintain my own copy.
>
> Would it not likely be easier to incorporate such an HTML
> scrap into a
> Wicket application, versus one written in a framework
such
> as Echo 2
> that abstracted away the HTML completely?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>] On Behalf
> Of Eelco
> Hillenius
> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 10:58 AM
> To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
> <mailto: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net>>
> Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Google Web Toolkit
integration ?
>
> > It's certainly an intriguing idea (have a look at
haxe.org <http://haxe.org>
> <http://haxe.org> if you find
> > it interesting), ...
> ...
> Yeah. I see some advantages of using layout managers -
> basically the
> same promise as Swing has - but currently I would still
> prefer using
> HTML for layout. If I would like the GWT way of
developing
> applications, I would have choosen Echo 2 a long time
ago.
> GWT looks
> like a next gen Echo to me, though with a very big name
> behind it, and
> some cool innovations. ... Eelco
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web
> services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to
> make your job easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1
based on
> Apache Geronimo
>
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642 <http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642>
>
<http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid%120709&bid&3057&dat%121642
<http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid%120709&bid&3057&dat%121642>>
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
> <mailto:Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net>>
>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
<https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user>
>
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your
job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
<http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642>
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
