On 8/10/06, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why - Just to look nice, or is this a case where you might be needing > to use a BookmarkablePageLink? There'll still be cases where Wicket > will use it's internal links (where there's state being passed > around), but there may also be cases where there's no state that could > be used by bookmarkable urls. > > If you can use a Bookmarkable page, then you can have that sort of > urls automagically, but I'd sugest avoiding trying to tweak the > internal format... > > /Gwyn
I agree with Gwyn. Such links are internal and should thus not be a problem for anything but 'beauty' (and even that is not too bad imo, as we're hiding pretty much everything we can). Eelco ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
