Hi I do not see difference between you two ;) samples
but maybe you was talking about that : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-387. I think, it will be fixed soon. cheers -- Vincent http://www.demay-fr.net/blog/ ChuckDeal a écrit : > wicket-ajax.js (revision 518211) appears to have a problem. > > I think lines 296-299 should be > var e = element.childNodes[i]; > if (e.tagName != null) { > result += Wicket.Form.serialize(e); > } > > but right now they are > var e = element.childNodes[i] { > if (e.tagName != null) { > result += Wicket.Form.serialize(e); > } > } > > Chuck > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
