1.2.6

we no longer need bodycontainer in 1.3 because we have a much more elegant
system for handling such things

-igor


On 3/31/07, Chris Colman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > > Java objects construct the way that they do and we use Java object
> > > constructors because we like that simplicity.  Your bug is
reported
> > and
> > > will be fixed.
> >
> > Any time schedule for that?
>
>
> the fix is in svn
>
> -igor

Excellent news! What will be the first public release that includes it -
1.2.x or 1.3.x?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to