> Yeah, that does sound like overkill in a single-threaded environment. > What other thread would ever be accessing a session's feedback messages?
Furthermore, copy on write is efficient when there are lots of reads and just a couple of writes, but that's not the case I think. So normal synchronization would almost certain be more efficient here. Eelco ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user