On Friday 18 May 2007 8:09 am, graemer escreveu:
> That's great, glad to hear Wicket has improved the landscape of Java web
> frameworks. What is great about Grails (and potentially Grails+Wicket) is
> that it spans all tiers, Wicket seems to be helping improve the web layer
> experience for Java web frameworks which is excellent. If only we didn't
> need persistence ;-)

        For me, one of the problems with grails is that my client has outlawed 
hibernate so we are using ibatis instead.

        I'm currently using a mixture of wicket and groovy and will look at 
your cool 
grails-wicket stuff this weekend or next week.   I'm certainly a huge fan of 
both groovy and wicket.

>
> Cheers
> Graeme
>
> ptrthomas wrote:
> > On 5/18/07, graemer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Haha, sorry but it seems some of the Wicket community are still living
> >> in Lala land with regards to believing everything deployed to production
> >> has to
> >> be written in Java. It is 2007, the realisation that Java is not the
> >> best language for web apps has hit home for years now. A good language
> >> for writing a lot of your business logic yes, but your business logic
> >> and web logic are two different things and if you're mixing them you're
> >> already making mistakes right there.
> >
> > Personally for me, Wicket has made using Java for web-applications
> > exciting
> > and fun again.  Maybe its a case of "teaching an old dog new tricks" but
> > I get a headache when I look at the sample at your link and see the
> > "closures"
> > for the onSubmit.  I guess I'm one of those retarded folks who avoids
> > learning new syntax :P
> >
> > About the wiki page [
> > http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/WicketBuilder ] I
> > have to complain that I think that the try / catch block is there just to
> > make the pure java code look bad in comparison - which is bogus, please
> > remove it.
> >
> > BTW I'm also having great results with the ReloadingWicketFilter - so it
> > is
> > possible to change your view code - refresh and it works.  So I don't
> > really
> > miss a scripting language that much.  If I'm productive with Java why
> > should
> > I change?  Just my 2c.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Peter.
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to