with decent specs on your web nodes you can generally
expect to get better performance than that... unless
you're limited by non-wicket back-end bottlenecks like 
db access.


Scott Swank wrote:
> 
> I have a quick question about server load, in particular I want to
> determine what sort of volume existing applications support.
> 
> We spread our load across 5 JBoss servers and need to support 200
> requests/second (40/second per server).  Are other Wicket applications
> handling this volume?
> 
> Thank you,
> Scott
> 
> -- 
> Scott Swank
> reformed mathematician
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/how-busy-a-site-is-wicket-known-to-support--tf3949732.html#a11206615
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to