> two points: > > this is relatively new, i think it made it in just before 1.3-beta1 or > somewhere there
I think it's been in there for quite a while. But as I never depended on it, I wouldn't know. > you didnt know about it, so of course you would be writing > getters/setters Heh. My point is that everyone did that on this project, including you as far as I can see. > - its easier to let the ide do that then write an > inner class :) so you see - not having this feature leads to bad OO as > you tend to break encapsulation Like I said before, I agree. Though calling having a few getters and setters on component you'd only use for Wicket bad OO is a bit far fetched imo. Eelco ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
