Another comment (for my defense):

Always check the UG as primary source of information !

In the sections   lapw1   and run_lapw   the correct behavior is described.

The   -in1ef   switch is never mentioned (it is an old, unsupported option)
The   -in1new XX   switch is still active and may be useful in certain 
situations, but
                   as mentioned, it can be "dangerous".

Also in the FAQ pages (qtlb, scf-failure), -in1ef is not mentioned, but it is 
(for my understanding)
quite well described how to analyse a QTL-B problem, with the recommendation of 
a manual change
of case.in1 (and not using any "switches").

The only "outdated" values are the   0.30    energies in the scf1-example of 
the scf-faq, because
"0.30" will only appear in the first scf-cycle (because EF=0.5  --> leading to 
E-params of 0.30),
later on "0.30" can only appear if EF=0.50 by coincidence.


Am 29.05.2013 16:45, schrieb Elias Assmann:
On 05/28/2013 05:32 PM, Peter Blaha wrote:
The default value 0.30 has to be changed. Use the –in1ef switch in
runsp_lapw

This is NOT TRUE !  When you use the latest WIEN2k version, I do NOT
recommend  -in1ef anymore.  Any 0.30 will be automatically adjusted to
EF-0.2 Ry.

I think that the FAQ ("qtlb", "scf") still reflects the "old" situation: 
changing linearization energies manually, and -in1new, if not -in1ef (s -in1new still
recommended?).  It might be helpful to change that.

     Elias

_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
[email protected]
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/index.html

--
-----------------------------------------
Peter Blaha
Inst. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna
Getreidemarkt 9, A-1060 Vienna, Austria
Tel: +43-1-5880115671
Fax: +43-1-5880115698
email: [email protected]
-----------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
[email protected]
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/index.html

Reply via email to