Hello,

Before the bug fix, create_elf_lapw and create_rho.f were producing a wrong ELF function in the non-spin-polarized case. However, with the bug fix sent previously this is now in the spin-polarized case that ELF is wrong. We will fix the problem for both cases and probably send the corrections in the mailing list.

On 03.11.2022 21:53, Zhu, Jianxin via Wien wrote:
Dear Peter and Kateryna,

Thanks for sorting this out.

Peter, the fixed bug in create_rho.f is a separate issue, right?

Best,

Jianxin

On 11/3/22, 2:13 PM, "Wien on behalf of Peter Blaha"
<wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at on behalf of
peter.bl...@tuwien.ac.at> wrote:

    Good to hear that this has been resolved.

PS: I just did a SnSe calc. and compared with the VASP paper. Similarly, very good agreement in the interstitial, while inside the atomic cores there is the expected difference between all-electron and pseudopotentials.

    Am 03.11.2022 um 21:06 schrieb Kateryna Foyevtsova:
    > Dear Prof. Blaha,
    >
> I think I know what's going on with ELF. Wien2k gets it correctly, but > Quantum Espresso has a bug which shows up in nspin=1 calculations. In
    > the attached figure I compare the wien2k result with two QE
> calculations: (1) one with nspin=1 switch and (2) one with nspin=2 > switch. In both cases I am looking at the same non-magnetic solution
    > that has the same energy in the two QE calculations.
    >
    > Now you see that the difference between QE nspin=1 and nspin=2 is
    > dramatic whereas there should be none.
    >
> The wien2k result looks very similar to the QE nspin=2 result in the > interstitial region at 0.5,0.5,0.0, marked with a big purple "X". There > are differences close to atomic nuclei but this is expected given that
    > we are comparing an all-electron and a pseudo-potenial code.
    >
    > Thank you very much for helping me resolve this issue.
    >
    > Best,
    > Kateryna
    >
    > On 2022-11-02 12:21, Peter Blaha wrote:
    >> [CAUTION: Non-UBC Email]
    >>
>> My result looks like the attached picture. I do get 0.8 in the core >> region of Ni, but not larger than that. It is probably similar than
    >> yours.
>> I have no idea why it is different from QE, except maybe that these
    >> are pseudopotential calc.
    >>
>> As I said before, you should compare other compounds, and also compare
    >> with literature ELF calculations.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> Am 01.11.2022 um 21:16 schrieb Kateryna Foyevtsova:
    >>> Dear Prof. Blaha,
    >>>
    >>> thank you for looking into this issue. I've tried the modified
>>> create_rho.f and calculated the ELF of NdNiO2 again using create_elf. >>> I am getting a better agreement with QE, but it is not perfect as you >>> noted it too. My calculation was well converged and I used the same >>> k-grid and RKmax=7. The bandstructures from QE and wien2k agree very
    >>> well.
    >>>
>>> I attach my comparison as a png file. I wonder whether you have any >>> idea about the possible reasons for the differences in ELF that the >>> two codes give? For example, at 0.5,0.5,0 the wien2k value is ~0.22
    >>> and the QE value is ~0.43.
    >>>
    >>> Thank you,
    >>> Kateryna
    >>>
    >>> On 2022-10-28 04:43, Peter Blaha wrote:
    >>>> [CAUTION: Non-UBC Email]
    >>>>
    >>>> Dear Kateryna ,
    >>>>
    >>>> In fact, I found a big difference between     create_elf   and
    >>>> x lapw0 (with VX_ELF); x lapw5 -exchange
    >>>>
>>>> I traced it back to normalization errors in tau_w and tau_tf, which
    >>>> missed a factor of 2.
    >>>>
>>>> The attached create_rho.f fixes the problem. It should be copied
    >>>> into SRC_trig; make
    >>>>
    >>>> Then you can use    create_elf   again.
    >>>>
>>>> PS: I would always compare the ELF created with both methods as >>>> indicated above. Depending on the numerics, one or the other method >>>> may give smoother plots, but in any case, they should be very similar.
    >>>>
>>>> PPS: The agreement to QE-ELF seems reasonable (but not perfect), but
    >>>> I've not converged my calculations.
    >>>>
    >>>> Thanks for the report
    >>>> Peter Blaha
    >>>>
    >>>>
>>>>> I attach a pdf showing the differences. Also attached are my wien2k
    >>>>> >struct file and quantum espresso input file.
    >>>>
>>>>> Both calculations were done without spin polarization and using PBE.
    >>>>
>>>>> To me, the differences are big enough to question whether it is >>>>> >meaningful to use ELF at all if it depends on all-electron vs >>>>> >pseudopotential so strongly. Unless I am missing something or
    >>>>> doing >something wrong.
    >>>>
    >>>>> Thank you,
    >>>>> Kateryna
    >>>>
    >>>> _______________________________________________
    >>>> Wien mailing list
    >>>> Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
    >>>>
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien__;!!Bt8fGhp8LhKGRg!HdoNzVpNDA2IMhU08EYBEcSBf7YeeqAHo79JdrKvk9EkNcpqIGhsJvRfNijHvucLQQhlNokYIvO1FvCv_93HGZURYw$

    >>>> SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
    >>>> wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.mail-archive.com/<a
href=>/index.html__;!!Bt8fGhp8LhKGRg!HdoNzVpNDA2IMhU08EYBEcSBf7YeeqAHo79JdrKvk9EkNcpqIGhsJvRfNijHvucLQQhlNokYIvO1FvCv_93CpHDqVw$">https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html__;!!Bt8fGhp8LhKGRg!HdoNzVpNDA2IMhU08EYBEcSBf7YeeqAHo79JdrKvk9EkNcpqIGhsJvRfNijHvucLQQhlNokYIvO1FvCv_93CpHDqVw$

    >>>
    >>>
    >>> _______________________________________________
    >>> Wien mailing list
    >>> Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
    >>>
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien__;!!Bt8fGhp8LhKGRg!HdoNzVpNDA2IMhU08EYBEcSBf7YeeqAHo79JdrKvk9EkNcpqIGhsJvRfNijHvucLQQhlNokYIvO1FvCv_93HGZURYw$

    >>> SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
    >>> wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.mail-archive.com/<a
href=>/index.html__;!!Bt8fGhp8LhKGRg!HdoNzVpNDA2IMhU08EYBEcSBf7YeeqAHo79JdrKvk9EkNcpqIGhsJvRfNijHvucLQQhlNokYIvO1FvCv_93CpHDqVw$">https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html__;!!Bt8fGhp8LhKGRg!HdoNzVpNDA2IMhU08EYBEcSBf7YeeqAHo79JdrKvk9EkNcpqIGhsJvRfNijHvucLQQhlNokYIvO1FvCv_93CpHDqVw$

    >>
    >> _______________________________________________
    >> Wien mailing list
    >> Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
    >>
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien__;!!Bt8fGhp8LhKGRg!HdoNzVpNDA2IMhU08EYBEcSBf7YeeqAHo79JdrKvk9EkNcpqIGhsJvRfNijHvucLQQhlNokYIvO1FvCv_93HGZURYw$

    >> SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
    >> wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.mail-archive.com/<a
href=>/index.html__;!!Bt8fGhp8LhKGRg!HdoNzVpNDA2IMhU08EYBEcSBf7YeeqAHo79JdrKvk9EkNcpqIGhsJvRfNijHvucLQQhlNokYIvO1FvCv_93CpHDqVw$">https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html__;!!Bt8fGhp8LhKGRg!HdoNzVpNDA2IMhU08EYBEcSBf7YeeqAHo79JdrKvk9EkNcpqIGhsJvRfNijHvucLQQhlNokYIvO1FvCv_93CpHDqVw$

    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Wien mailing list
    > Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
    >
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien__;!!Bt8fGhp8LhKGRg!HdoNzVpNDA2IMhU08EYBEcSBf7YeeqAHo79JdrKvk9EkNcpqIGhsJvRfNijHvucLQQhlNokYIvO1FvCv_93HGZURYw$

    > SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.mail-archive.com/<a
href=>/index.html__;!!Bt8fGhp8LhKGRg!HdoNzVpNDA2IMhU08EYBEcSBf7YeeqAHo79JdrKvk9EkNcpqIGhsJvRfNijHvucLQQhlNokYIvO1FvCv_93CpHDqVw$">https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html__;!!Bt8fGhp8LhKGRg!HdoNzVpNDA2IMhU08EYBEcSBf7YeeqAHo79JdrKvk9EkNcpqIGhsJvRfNijHvucLQQhlNokYIvO1FvCv_93CpHDqVw$


    --
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
    Phone: +43-1-58801-165300
    Email: peter.bl...@tuwien.ac.at    WIEN2k:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.wien2k.at__;!!Bt8fGhp8LhKGRg!HdoNzVpNDA2IMhU08EYBEcSBf7YeeqAHo79JdrKvk9EkNcpqIGhsJvRfNijHvucLQQhlNokYIvO1FvCv_91VuYNgsQ$

    WWW:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at__;!!Bt8fGhp8LhKGRg!HdoNzVpNDA2IMhU08EYBEcSBf7YeeqAHo79JdrKvk9EkNcpqIGhsJvRfNijHvucLQQhlNokYIvO1FvCv_92GHJNddg$

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
    _______________________________________________
    Wien mailing list
    Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at

https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien__;!!Bt8fGhp8LhKGRg!HdoNzVpNDA2IMhU08EYBEcSBf7YeeqAHo79JdrKvk9EkNcpqIGhsJvRfNijHvucLQQhlNokYIvO1FvCv_93HGZURYw$

    SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.mail-archive.com/<a
href=>/index.html__;!!Bt8fGhp8LhKGRg!HdoNzVpNDA2IMhU08EYBEcSBf7YeeqAHo79JdrKvk9EkNcpqIGhsJvRfNijHvucLQQhlNokYIvO1FvCv_93CpHDqVw$">https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html__;!!Bt8fGhp8LhKGRg!HdoNzVpNDA2IMhU08EYBEcSBf7YeeqAHo79JdrKvk9EkNcpqIGhsJvRfNijHvucLQQhlNokYIvO1FvCv_93CpHDqVw$


_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
_______________________________________________
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html

Reply via email to