Most of my reviewing for conference and journals was double blind, although the effectiveness of it was always a bit questionable, as in many cases you can, as a reviewer, identify the author from the style and argument. This tends to get worse in specialised areas, where the pool of researchers is necessarily small.
Adam On 7 November 2012 06:16, Kerry Raymond <kerry.raym...@gmail.com> wrote: > I cannot speak for other disciplines but double-blind is not standard in > Computer Science. **** > > ** ** > > Kerry**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l > >
_______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
