Rupert, presentation sheets are at 
http://infodisiac.com/Wikimedia/2014%20London.pdf
Cheers, Erik

-----Original Message-----
From: Wiki-research-l <wiki-research-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org> On Behalf 
Of wiki-research-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2019 13:00
To: wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Wiki-research-l Digest, Vol 162, Issue 5

Send Wiki-research-l mailing list submissions to
        wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        wiki-research-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        wiki-research-l-ow...@lists.wikimedia.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: 
Contents of Wiki-research-l digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: [Wikimedia-l] Farewell, Erik! (rupert THURNER)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 11:21:27 +0100
From: rupert THURNER <rupert.thur...@gmail.com>
To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org>
Cc: "A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who
        has an interest in Wikipedia and analytics."
        <analyt...@lists.wikimedia.org>, Research into Wikimedia content and
        communities <wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] [Wikimedia-l] Farewell, Erik!
Message-ID:
        <CAJs9aZ_4tVJc3Lbi-kUZbFhNUYGPJeodayqwKUjKnbX4sYP=z...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Many thanks erik and all the best!! One sentence in eriks blog post cited i 
found surprising. What type of modesty you guys were talking about?

"At Wikimania London (2014) I talked about how we should err on the side of 
modesty. That message never came across. I started to have a discussion on this 
within WMF but failed to bring this to fruition. My bad."



On Wed, Feb 6, 2019, 22:18 Dario Taraborelli <dtarabore...@wikimedia.org
wrote:

> “[R]ecent revisions of an article can be peeled off to reveal older 
> layers, which are still meaningful for historians. Even graffiti 
> applied by vandals can by its sheer informality convey meaningful 
> information, just like historians learned a lot from graffiti on walls 
> of classic Pompei. Likewise view patterns can tell future historians a 
> lot about what was hot and what wasn’t in our times. Reason why these 
> raw view data are meant to be preserved for a long time.”
>
> Erik Zachte wrote these lines in a blog post < 
> https://web.archive.org/web/20171018194720/http://infodisiac.com/blog/
> 2009/07/michael-jackson/
> >
> almost
> ten years ago, and I cannot find better words to describe the gift he 
> gave us. Erik retired 
> <http://infodisiac.com/back_to_volunteer_mode.htm> this past Friday, 
> leaving behind an immense legacy. I had the honor to work with him for 
> several years, and I hosted this morning an intimate, tearful celebration of 
> what Erik has represented for the Wikimedia movement.
>
> His Wikistats project <https://stats.wikimedia.org/>—with his 
> signature pale yellow background we've known and loved since the mid 
> 2000s 
> <https://web.archive.org/web/20060412043240/https://stats.wikimedia.or
> g/
> >—has
> been much more than an "analytics platform". It's been an individual 
> attempt he initiated, and grew over time, to try and comprehend and 
> make sense of the largest open collaboration project in human history, 
> driven by curiosity and by an insatiable desire to serve data to the 
> communities that most needed it.
>
> Through this project, Erik has created a live record of data 
> describing the growth and reach of all Wikimedia communities, across 
> languages and projects, putting multi-lingualism and smaller 
> communities at the very center of his attention. He coined metrics 
> such as "active editors" that defined the benchmark for volunteers, 
> the Wikimedia Foundation, and the academic community to understand 
> some of the growing pains and editor retention issues < 
> https://web.archive.org/web/20110608214507/http://infodisiac.com/blog/
> 2009/12/new-editors-are-joining-english-wikipedia-in-droves/
> >
> the movement has faced. He created countless reports—that predate by 
> nearly a decade modern visualizations of online attention—to 
> understand what Wikipedia traffic means in the context of current 
> events like elections < 
> https://web.archive.org/web/20160405055621/http://infodisiac.com/blog/
> 2008/09/sarah-palin/
> >
> or public health crises
> <
> https://web.archive.org/web/20090708011216/http://infodisiac.com/blog/
> 2009/05/h1n1-flu-or-new-flu-or/
> >.
> He has created countless
> <https://twitter.com/Infodisiac/status/1039244151953543169> 
> visualizations < 
> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2017/10/27/new-interactive-visualization-wi
> kipedia/
> >
> that show the enormous gaps in local language content and 
> representation that, as a movement, we face in our efforts to build an 
> encyclopedia for and about everyone. He has also made extensive use of 
> pie charts < 
> https://web.archive.org/web/20141222073751/http://infodisiac.com/blog/
> wp-content/uploads/2008/10/piechartscorrected.png
> >,
> which—as friends—we are ready to turn a blind eye towards.
>
> Most importantly, the data Erik has brougth to life has been cited 
> over
> 1,000 times
> <
> https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=stats.wikimedi
> a.org
> >
> in the scholarly literature. If we gave credit to open data creators 
> in the same way as we credit authors of scholarly papers, Erik would 
> be one of the most influential authors in the field, and I don't think 
> it is much of a stretch to say that the massive trove of data and 
> metrics Erik has made available had a direct causal role in the birth 
> and growth of the academic field of Wikimedia research, and more 
> broadly, scholarship of online collaboration.
>
> Like I said this morning, Erik -- you have been not only an invaluable 
> colleague and a steward for the movement, but also a very decent human 
> being, and I am grateful we shared some of this journey together.
>
> Please join me in celebrating Erik on his well-deserved retirement, 
> read his statement <http://infodisiac.com/back_to_volunteer_mode.htm> 
> to learn what he's planning to do next, or check this lovely portrait 
> <https://www.wired.com/2013/12/erik-zachte-wikistats/> Wired published 
> a while back about "the Stats Master Making Sense of Wikipedia's 
> Massive Data Trove".
>
> Dario
>
>
> --
> *Dario Taraborelli  *Director, Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation 
> research.wikimedia.org • nitens.org • @readermeter 
> <http://twitter.com/readermeter> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: wikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>


------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l


------------------------------

End of Wiki-research-l Digest, Vol 162, Issue 5
***********************************************


_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Reply via email to