https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #76 from Helder <heldergeov...@gmail.com> 2009-05-05 13:04:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #75) > But I'd suggest, to stick to the facts and to stay sober and to keep emotions > out of the discussion. Arguments like your 1)-3) are rather counterproductive. I don't agree with you, brf. I think Dscho said what is most rational _to do_: Since #49 there was no comments from the Wikimedia developers about this bug and they had not discussed the issues with the LilyPond developers. (I was looking for this at http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-04/msg00273.html [Sorry for the delay in the answer Dscho, I was a little busy this two weeks =/]) But, it is needed to have a clear description of the problem in order to have a solution. In other words, even if someone could work on LilyPond to correct the problems, they would need to know what the problems are! In this sense, we need the participation of Wikimedia team... Helder -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
