https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
--- Comment #81 from Helder <heldergeov...@gmail.com> 2009-05-05 16:30:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #77) > (In reply to comment #76) > > I think Dscho said what is most rational _to do_: Since #49 there was no > > comments from the Wikimedia developers about this bug and they had not > > discussed the issues with the LilyPond developers. > > I am a MediaWiki developer and have commented repeatedly since comment 49. I > don't have the ability to enable extensions on Wikipedia, I only have commit > access, but I believe I understand the requirements adequately, and if I > don't, > I can ask people who do. If anyone requires clarifications on what is needed > for LilyPond to be usable by Wikimedia, they can ask. So far, no one has. I > have plenty of other things to do and don't care about this bug immensely, so > I'm not going to be willing to take the initiative to dig up and pester > LilyPond devs about getting this fixed. If LilyPond devs feel the same way, > then I guess ABC will just be used forever. I'm really sorry about my previous comment... I misunderstood the situation when I wrote "there was no comments from the Wikimedia developers about this bug": * I forgot your Comment #62 =( * I was thinking about Tim/Brion, because by comments like Comment #25 it seemed to me that it would be necessary a explanation of some of them about the "real reasons" that Dscho pointed in (1) Sorry again... Well, as I saw at Comment #55 and at http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-02/msg00022.html the item (b) pointed by Tim (in comment #37) is not really a issue, am I right? But in the same message Graham Percival said that "trying to keep lilypond within certain CPU-time limits is going to be hard". Would this be solved by doing what Dscho said at http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-02/msg00023.html ? After this, was said that "Scheme just should be disabled for the purpose of the MediaWiki extension." (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-04/msg00265.html). How much of the issues would be solved with this? By the way, I've found this other discussion, now about a new extension ABC http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2008-October/039988.html I would like to know if the 3 questions Brion asked about it are also to be considered in the context of LilyPond extension? A nice week to all! =D Bests regards, Helder -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
