https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
Technical 13 <technical...@yahoo.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |technical...@yahoo.com --- Comment #14 from Technical 13 <technical...@yahoo.com> --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Like I said on bug 57315, there are still too many unanswered questions > > about > > this namespace to roll it out in a hasty way. > > Does anyone else share your view? I fully share this view. I've been toying with the idea of an extension here for some time. There is this new namespace, there is the new userright that the community agreed upon, there are the common complaints that AfC templates and scripts don't do this or that (and can't be modified as the wiki stands to without creating an on-by-default gadget or adding code to MediaWiki:Common.js or possibly by creating a guided tour (which is a fairly new option that was introduced as I've been developing the extension)). There are a LOT of factors that need to go into draft creation alone, not to mention I think (as I stated in bug 57315) that I think requested articles could be rolled into articles for creation and the whole process could be streamlined. I'm constantly seeing stuff about editor retention and we need to do this and that and that is great, but what I have a problem with is the fact that our current fairly difficult to use system turns new editors away... Maybe stating the obvious, but if there are fewer new editors, then there is a much smaller pool to work from for retention. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l