https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57569
--- Comment #15 from Technical 13 <technical...@yahoo.com> --- (In reply to comment #4) > As I stated at the other bug, these are not questions that need to block > creation of the namespace. It rather seems apparent that you saw this > proposal > as something other than it was -- a more substantial change to AFC that you > had > already envisioned prior -- but it wasn't, and the closure states that pretty > clearly. > > Anyone is allowed to create drafts because anyone was allowed to before. This > is just a change to their location. > > Publishing drafts will continue to merely require a move to mainspace, > because > that's all that was required before. > > We don't need to tell anyone anything other than through altered > documentation > at AFC, because nothing other than that will be changing. > > Phrasing these added proposals as questions doesn't make them requirements > that > apply to this proposal. They are merely possible additions that should be > proposed and discussed separately. As concerns this proposal, we need only > create a draft namespace. Wait, IP editors aren't allow to create pages in this new draft: namespace? They will still have to create in Draft_talk:? At least that's what I'm reading here, exactly the same as before only people will use "Draft( talk):" instead of "Wikipedia( talk):Articles for creation/"? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
