https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59815
--- Comment #9 from Steven Walling <swall...@wikimedia.org> --- (In reply to comment #8) > I reiterate, this is not a bug as it is by design. > To expand on what Jon said... - I could totally understand that if you didn't see the announcement about the latest version,[1] or the patches in gerrit to the VectorBeta extension, you might think this was not an intentional change, and thus might be an important bug to raise. - However, this was an intentional design decision, made for reasons we outline on Talk:Typography refresh on mediawiki.org - Disagreeing with an aesthetic change is of course fine, and Raimond's commentary is entirely constructive and helpful. But it's not the same thing as there actually being a bug, in the sense that something is broken and we need to fix it. Not when it's design change that is 100% opt-in, and is meant to be experimental. So in other words, this isn't a bug. Nothing is broken. It's an aesthetic disagreement. Please put feedback about the typography Beta Feature on the Talk page (https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Typography_refresh) where there is already discussion about this and the other recent changes. 1. https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Typography_refresh&oldid=880232#Update_to_Typography_refresh -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
