https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70576
--- Comment #9 from James Forrester <jforres...@wikimedia.org> --- (In reply to MZMcBride from comment #8) > (In reply to James Forrester from comment #7) > > Semi-+1 from a Product perspective; I'd recommend that LCA get flagged (at > > the very least) first before considering it a +2. > > LCA presumably refers to [[wmf:LCA]]. Can you expand on why involvement from > the LCA group is recommended here? Are you worried about editing disclaimer > text? I'm having difficulty imagining user pages or global (wikifarm-wide) > bits and pieces being a legal issue (we've had both for a very long > time...), but then again, I'm not a lawyer! It's the C, not the L, part of LCA that will mostly care, as it trivially impacts community audit requirements. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
