https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70576
James Alexander <jalexan...@wikimedia.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jalexan...@wikimedia.org --- Comment #16 from James Alexander <jalexan...@wikimedia.org> --- (In reply to James Forrester from comment #9) > (In reply to MZMcBride from comment #8) > > (In reply to James Forrester from comment #7) > > > Semi-+1 from a Product perspective; I'd recommend that LCA get flagged (at > > > the very least) first before considering it a +2. > > > > LCA presumably refers to [[wmf:LCA]]. Can you expand on why involvement from > > the LCA group is recommended here? Are you worried about editing disclaimer > > text? I'm having difficulty imagining user pages or global (wikifarm-wide) > > bits and pieces being a legal issue (we've had both for a very long > > time...), but then again, I'm not a lawyer! > > It's the C, not the L, part of LCA that will mostly care, as it trivially > impacts community audit requirements. I +1 :) it's something that we've wanted for ages and the (all non blocking) concerns I brought up with lego are already mostly covered. Some people will be confused at first but the page banner (which I agree is better on top, easier to see) will help with that and something like this does not deserve a CN banner. God I wish we had the ability to do custom echo notifications easier. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l