| ArielGlenn added a comment. |
(Sorry for the near-stream-of-consciousness updates here, just trying to Get **It Done.) To get the sha1 discussion started:
I can't imagine any script is going to care about the revision sha1 as separate from the sha1 of the content of each slot separately; if you want to know if an edit was reverted, you can look at the sha1 of the individual slots, and I imagine that much analysis will focus on slot-level activity rather than the set of slots for a given revision. Until we have content in multiple slots, the value will be the same, so it, like everything else, will become an issue next month when Structured Data on Commons goes live. For that reason I'd put the main slot content sha1 in the revision sha1 tag and not even bother with the computed revision sha1 described above.
Please poke holes in this so that we can reach agreement as soon as possible :-)
Cc: kchapman, tstarling, awight, JAllemandou, hoo, pmiazga, Nemo_bis, brion, Tgr, Aklapper, Fjalapeno, ArielGlenn, daniel, Nandana, kostajh, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, Lunewa, QZanden, LawExplorer, JJMC89, Agabi10, D3r1ck01, SBisson, gnosygnu, Wikidata-bugs, aude, GWicke, jayvdb, fbstj, santhosh, Jdforrester-WMF, Mbch331, Rxy, Jay8g, Ltrlg, bd808, Legoktm
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
