FaFlo added a comment.

Of course checksums make lot of of sense for countless use cases, including many in research (mentioned paper was never intended to make a sweeping point to the contrary, but yes, discussion for another time).
And I think MCR is awesome, JFTR.

Regarding the question at hand, I would feel that "this-is-the-text-tag-hash semantics" would provide more value (from my research-bubble perspective), even if it breaks convention. Then, every single part has an individual sha (just as before with the single text part, now there are just more parts). I subscribe to the we-are-breaking-it-anyway view.


TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T199121

EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: ArielGlenn, FaFlo
Cc: FaFlo, Halfak, vrandezo, Denny, kchapman, tstarling, awight, JAllemandou, hoo, pmiazga, Nemo_bis, brion, Tgr, Aklapper, Fjalapeno, ArielGlenn, daniel, Nandana, kostajh, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, Lunewa, QZanden, LawExplorer, JJMC89, Agabi10, D3r1ck01, SBisson, gnosygnu, Wikidata-bugs, aude, GWicke, jayvdb, fbstj, santhosh, Jdforrester-WMF, Mbch331, Rxy, Jay8g, Ltrlg, bd808, Legoktm
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

Reply via email to