Smalyshev added a comment.

  > it at least make sense to raise the issue so that the WDQS use case is 
addressed if it can be addressed
  
  For that, we better define "WDQS case". The best I have right now is the 
event aggregation idea described above. In theory, it could also be combined 
with data loading (so that Wikidata data is loaded only once per stream) though 
I am not sure how well it would work given that data sizes for some items are 
pretty large and combining huge data arrays with small events may be 
counter-productive. Some intermediate storage may solve the issue.

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T217897

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Smalyshev
Cc: Smalyshev, BBlack, Aklapper, Gehel, alaa_wmde, Legado_Shulgin, Nandana, 
thifranc, AndyTan, Davinaclare77, Qtn1293, Lahi, Gq86, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, 
GoranSMilovanovic, Th3d3v1ls, Hfbn0, QZanden, EBjune, merbst, LawExplorer, 
Zppix, _jensen, rosalieper, Jonas, Xmlizer, Wong128hk, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, 
Jdouglas, aude, Tobias1984, Manybubbles, faidon, Mbch331, Jay8g, fgiunchedi
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

Reply via email to