BBlack added a comment.

  I think it would be better, from my perspective, to really understand the 
use-cases better (which I don't).  Why do these remote clients need "realtime" 
(no staleness) fetches of Q items?  What I hear is it sounds like all clients 
expect everything to be perfectly synchronous, but I don't understand why they 
need to be perfectly synchronous.  In the case that lead to this ticket, it was 
a remote client at Orange issuing a very high rate of these uncacheable 
queries, which seems like a bulk data load/update process, not an "I just 
edited this thing and need to see my own edits reflected" sort of case.

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T217897

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: BBlack
Cc: Smalyshev, BBlack, Aklapper, Gehel, alaa_wmde, Legado_Shulgin, Nandana, 
thifranc, AndyTan, Davinaclare77, Qtn1293, Lahi, Gq86, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, 
GoranSMilovanovic, Th3d3v1ls, Hfbn0, QZanden, EBjune, merbst, LawExplorer, 
Zppix, _jensen, rosalieper, Jonas, Xmlizer, Wong128hk, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, 
Jdouglas, aude, Tobias1984, Manybubbles, faidon, Mbch331, Jay8g, fgiunchedi
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

Reply via email to