Mike_Peel added a comment.
Personally, I would like to see us going in a different direction - we should stop excluding namespaces. For the 'Draft' namespace in particular, I don't like it, but it's unlikely to go away any time soon. So if we want to encourage people to use Wikidata information in articles, without having to constantly define the QID, then we should allow sitelinks to the draft articles. They would only be temporary after all, since enwp seems to periodically delete drafts. But to answer @Lydia_Pintscher's specific question: I think it's fine to leave the sitelink to a redirect. If the draft gets deleted, then the redirect will also be deleted, and the sitelink removed. Probably the same will also apply to other excluded namespaces. The important thing is that sitelinks are removed if the page they are linking to no longer exists at all. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T261275 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Mike_Peel Cc: MisterSynergy, Mike_Peel, noarave, ChristianKl, Mohammed_Sadat_WMDE, Aklapper, Lydia_Pintscher, Akuckartz, Iflorez, alaa_wmde, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, LawExplorer, _jensen, rosalieper, Scott_WUaS, Jonas, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
